- Are the Hobbit movies really that bad?
- Is it hard to read Lord of the Rings?
- Is LotR worth reading?
- What comes after The Lord of the Rings?
- Why did the Hobbit trilogy fail?
- Is Lord of the Rings better than Harry Potter?
- How old is Legolas?
- Why did they make the Lord of the Rings before the Hobbit?
- Why did they use so much CGI in The Hobbit?
- Why didnt Guillermo del Toro direct The Hobbit?
- Which is better the Hobbit or Lord of the Rings?
- Should I read the Hobbit or The Lord of the Rings first?
- Is the lord of the rings the same as the hobbit?
- Why does Lord of the Rings look better than the Hobbit?
- How old is Aragorn in LOTR?
- Has Lord of the Rings sold more than Harry Potter?
- Who is better Gandalf or Dumbledore?
- Is Percy Jackson or Harry Potter better?
Are the Hobbit movies really that bad?
The Hobbit films were bad films.
It misused its time.
I love An Unexpected Journey, but it’s all downhill from that.
I may very well be wrong here but I can’t help but feel like if they simply took the love story out and used similar CGI to LOTR, people would be complaining much less about The Hobbit movies..
Is it hard to read Lord of the Rings?
The stories, characters, and world can be hard to conceptualize for young readers, but the actual language is not incredibly difficult. I do think someone who is very comfortable with English will appreciate the delicate word choice and rhythm of the books, but you shouldn’t have any trouble understanding them.
Is LotR worth reading?
The Lord of the Rings trilogy is absolutely worth reading, even though they’re very long and a bit monotonous. There’s so much to the story that doesn’t make it into movies, side stories and fascinating tidbits that you miss if you don’t take the plunge.
What comes after The Lord of the Rings?
The Silmarillion (released after the Lord of the Rings trilogy) also contains the creation of the World and the tales and deeds of the First Age. … The Hobbit, LotR trilogy and the Silmarillion are usually called “The Big Three” and are a must-read for any Tolkien fan.
Why did the Hobbit trilogy fail?
Hobbit lacked the focus of the LOTR movies and tried to correct the issue mid-stride in a way that just didn’t work. … The meeting with Beorn was cool, but had it been left out of the film, I can’t say the story would feel any different. Same for the love story with Tauriel.
Is Lord of the Rings better than Harry Potter?
Which is better? That really depends on what you value more in your fantasy novels. Harry Potter has much more rounded and relatable characters and (I would argue) better storytelling than LOTR, but LOTR is way better at world-building and lore. The Harry Potter series does character development beautifully.
How old is Legolas?
2931 years oldIn the official movie guide for The Lord of the Rings, a birthdate for Legolas is set to TA 87. This would make him 2931 years old at the time of the War of the Ring. Coincidentally, Aragorn was born during the year 2931 in the Third Age.
Why did they make the Lord of the Rings before the Hobbit?
Originally Answered: Why did Peter jackson released the Lord of the rings series before Hobbit, even though Tolkiens wrote Hobbit before LOTR? Mostly because of rights issues. In 1968, Tolkien sold the film rights to The Hobbit and Lord of the Rings to United Artists, reportedly for just £10,000.
Why did they use so much CGI in The Hobbit?
Since the Hobbit movies were so highly anticipated, they didn’t get nearly enough preproduction time to make costumes for a ton of extras, and CGI by then was far cheaper than individual props and stunts.
Why didnt Guillermo del Toro direct The Hobbit?
Del Toro said in a statement: “In light of ongoing delays in the setting of a start date for filming The Hobbit, I am faced with the hardest decision of my life .
Which is better the Hobbit or Lord of the Rings?
Although both books had challenges and death along the way, The Hobbit was more contained in its stakes, while The Lord of the Rings was much grander. … The Ring of Power also played a much simpler role in The Hobbit. It didn’t make Bilbo evil; it just helped him on his adventure. Its influence had yet to reach its peak.
Should I read the Hobbit or The Lord of the Rings first?
Chronologically it comes before The Lord of the Rings, and it introduces major characters and lays the groundwork for LotR. You can skip The Hobbit or read it after LotR, but many things in LotR will make more sense if you read The Hobbit first. Once you’ve finished The Hobbit, read The Lord of the Rings.
Is the lord of the rings the same as the hobbit?
Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit are connected because they are both set in the same universe, Middle Earth. Although they are set in the same universe The Hobbit takes place 60 years before the Lord of the Rings. … Also, in the Lord of the Rings, Gandalf also plays a big role in the books.
Why does Lord of the Rings look better than the Hobbit?
Why do the LOTR movies look so much better than the new Hobbit series? Even though they’re much older, the CGI seems so much more realistic. … The orcs don’t move the same way that they moved in LOTR either. You can really tell they are CGI by their movements.
How old is Aragorn in LOTR?
87 years oldSo exactly how old is Aragorn during The Lord of the Rings? As confirmed by Aragorn himself in the movie, he’s 87 years old. His reign as the High King lasts for 122 years, which ends with his death at the age of 210.
Has Lord of the Rings sold more than Harry Potter?
In terms of book sales, The Lord of the Rings wins comfortably with around 150 million copies sold, with the top selling HP book ‘Harry Potter and the Philosophers Stone’ being 50 million behind at 100 million.
Who is better Gandalf or Dumbledore?
Gandalf is greater than Dumbledore although (or perhaps because) he had less power. He rallied all the free peoples of Middle-Earth to the cause, gave them heart, and sacrificed himself to save his friends and the quest in Moria. He worked tirelessly for centuries.
Is Percy Jackson or Harry Potter better?
It had better villans, more battles, lots of emotions, and better pairings (for me). The stakes of losing the war they’re fighting in is shown in both series. Percy Jackson had better villans (Kronos, the giants, primordial Gaea and Tartarus) while Harry Potter had Voldemort and the Death Eaters.